"And what of Ignatieff’s defeat? Canada comprises cities separated by vast distances. It is a real achievement to lose the cities, and Ignatieff managed it. Again we feel the influence of Bush: the modern excoriation of intellect scared Ignatieff and he began droppin’ his gs and decrying all that was “partisan” – which is American for believing in something."
—
Canada’s cold new dawn | Heather Mallick | Comment is free | The Guardian
Ugh, this.
I am upset about the election too, but:
1) ” a Canadian version of George W Bush, minus the warmth and intellect, is now prime minister” is wrong in a couple of ways. I don’t think anyone thinks Harper is stupid (I sure don’t) and he has actually been Prime Minister for the last five years. (Though in precarious minority governments where he had to negotiate with various lefty opposition parties and couldn’t get away with the shit he’s going to start pulling now.)
2) The implication that being from Calgary makes him automatically sinister. Hi, Heather Mallick! I am from Calgary! I am all about abortion access and people getting gay married and not building giant prisons. These things don’t come from being from Calgary. I think painting other regions with a broadly negative brush (shades of red-state/blue-state) is not a good way to cope with this long national nightmare. A Torontonian dismissively writing in a British paper about those angry Western jerks…is kind of exactly why people in Alberta feel alienated in the first place.
3) The above. I don’t think Ignatieff lost because of “the modern excoriation of intellect.” He lost because he had no platform, because a lot of centre-right voters saw him as a guy who hadn’t lived in the country for 35 years before he ran for party leadership, and a lot of centre-left voters who might have gone liberal couldn’t get over his support for the Iraq War or the fact that he wrote The Lesser Evil, basically abandoning the moral argument for human rights he spent his whole career advocating the minute the going got tough.