May 15, 2013
kmnml:

gq:

Ellie Kemper Asks: Can Men Be Funny?




“Reading a chapter from Warren Buffett’s Tap Dancing to Work the other day, I was surprised to find myself chuckling out loud. Now this guy is kind of funny, I thought to myself as I turned the page and grabbed another Danish. This guy is kind of making me laugh. And those thoughts that I had quietly, in my head, to myself, made me realize just how rarely I do have those thoughts in my head. And that thought led me to another thought, which was: why is that? Why, on the whole, are men just not that funny?”




Read On: Can Men Be Funny? A scientific-y investigation

this is great.

Ugh, so perfect. The Emily Dickinson stuff at the end? Slayed

kmnml:

gq:

Ellie Kemper Asks: Can Men Be Funny?

“Reading a chapter from Warren Buffett’s Tap Dancing to Work the other day, I was surprised to find myself chuckling out loud. Now this guy is kind of funny, I thought to myself as I turned the page and grabbed another Danish. This guy is kind of making me laugh. And those thoughts that I had quietly, in my head, to myself, made me realize just how rarely I do have those thoughts in my head. And that thought led me to another thought, which was: why is that? Why, on the whole, are men just not that funny?”

Read On: Can Men Be Funny? A scientific-y investigation

this is great.

Ugh, so perfect. The Emily Dickinson stuff at the end? Slayed

October 11, 2012
"Reading from his novel Summer Of Hate."

Chris Kraus | Books Listings | NOW Magazine

Good job everyone.

11:05am  |   URL: http://tmblr.co/ZSRIbyV4l72T
  
Filed under: feminism chris kraus 
September 27, 2012
Name and Shame: MPs who voted in favour of M312

amatsuki:

MPs in favour of Motion 312:

That a special committee of the House be appointed and directed to review the declaration in Subsection 223(1) of the Criminal Code which states that a child becomes a human being only at the moment of complete birth

Liberals

  • Jim Karygiannis, Scarborough–Agincourt ON
  • John McKay, Scarborough–Guildwood ON
  • Lawrence McCauley, Cardigan PE
  • Kevin Lamoureux, Winnipeg North MB

Conservative Cabinet

  • Diane Ablonczy, Minister of State for Foreign Affairs (Americas and Consular Affairs), Calgary–Nose Hill AB
  • Rona Ambrose, Minister for the Status of Women (shame especially on her), Edmonton–Spruce Grove AB
  • Julian Fantino, Minister for International Cooperation, Vaughan ON
  • Jason Kenney, Minister of Immigration, Calgary Southeast AB
  • Peter Penashue, Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs, Newfoundland NL
  • Gerry Ritz, Minister of Agriculture, Battlefords–Lloydminster SK
  • Gail Shea, Minister of National Revenue, Egmont PE
  • Peter Van Loan, Leader of the House of Commons, York–Simcoe ON
  • Alice Wong, Minister of State (Seniors), Richmond BC

Read More

You guys the MINISTER FOR THE STATUS OF WOMEN in Canada voted for a bill that would basically “re-open” the fetus-personhood debate. I mostly try not to get sucked into this kind of partisan stuff because I pretty much didn’t think there was any chance that this would pass and honestly it all just felt like stupid Conservative pandering to their socially conservative “base” and if I was going to turn into a political activist I’d be more mad about Bill C-10 which is legit dangerous piece of legislation that would hurt a lot of Canadians and communities and is actually likely to pass.

BUT as I understand via my legally educated boyfriend, Canadian abortion rights are actually on somewhat shaky ground if anyone with actual power got it in their heads to do anything about it. With, say, same sex marriage it would pretty hard for the government to even pretend to make noise about shifting the status quo. Not only did the courts say that not allowing same sex marriage is unconstitutional, but then Parliament passed a law allowing same sex marriage nation wide (a lot of provinces already allowed it though). But the Morgentaler decision that declared the law criminalizing abortion unconstitutional? Just struck down the law. So now there are no (criminal) laws about abortion at all - so it’s not illegal but I think that they definitely could regulate aspects of it (particularly if the definition of personhood in the Criminal Code changed) so there is room for chipping away, and I am surprised that this many MPs are willing to be publicly associated with doing that.

May 10, 2012
katherinestasaph:

fellowette:

masterpieceofass:

DivineTheDivine submits: Glamour Magazine knows that Mr. Wet Shirt is all it takes—
A MANIFESTO FOR US ALL!!

LIKE.

DISLIKE.
>HETERONORMATIVITY OFF

Hate everything about this. Mr Darcy is not yr sexual liberation.

katherinestasaph:

fellowette:

masterpieceofass:

DivineTheDivine submits: Glamour Magazine knows that Mr. Wet Shirt is all it takes—

A MANIFESTO FOR US ALL!!

LIKE.

DISLIKE.

>HETERONORMATIVITY OFF

Hate everything about this. Mr Darcy is not yr sexual liberation.

April 10, 2012
Notes on Tiny Furniture:
Realness, part 1: Dunham uses her own family, her own high school friend, her own apartment, her own video art in the movie. But it’s not an amateurish movie. There are a lot of just perfectly framed shots. In the movie, her sister calls her “desperate”, calls her work desperate for attention, mostly because she’s not wearing pants. I read that her dad wouldn’t participate in the movie, because of privacy concerns.
Realness, part 2: What really won me over was Dunham’s enactment of failed femininity. Representations of girls who don’t just “naturally” exude cuteness and sweetness and girlness are really important to me, and I love how Dunham does this. Her hair’s unbrushed, she never wears pants, she has zits. When she wears lipstick or whatever it doesn’t look perfect or natural or right still. Don’t get me wrong, I think Dunham’s super-cute IRL, but she really, in the movie, works at looking ordinary. She kind of exposes herself to you, like she did in her video art, which draws a lot of comments on Youtube about how “fat” she is. I found it surprisingly compelling to be confronted constantly by a body that looks…a lot like mine. It seems counterintuitive to want to fix the problems of the male gaze by putting more partially dressed women on film, but it was really powerful for me.
Sex in a Pipe: I can’t even find anything to say about the sex-in-a-pipe scene, but I think it’s probably really important to the overall context of the movie and I just want to remind myself when I think of the movie not to forget about it.
Vulnerability is a privilege: I know one of the critiques of Dunham is that she’s uber-privileged. Her family’s well-off, her parents are successful in the art world, it kind of seems like she should have nothing to feel bad about, or no “real” problems or whatever. But I think that all those layers of privilege probably are what allows her to be this vulnerable, in her work. Just to feel safe exposing that much.
Being Successful: I like the part where Aura’s friend Charlotte tells her that their people are assholes, their parents are assholes. Aura insists that her mom isn’t an asshole, and Charlotte replies that she must be an asshole to be as successful as she is. I feel like the movie kind of posits the successful = asshole equation. Certainly true of “he’s a big deal on youtube” guy. While this isn’t true at all in my experience, I do feel like it’s probably something Aura believes. In the last scene, when Aura’s in bed with her mom, she tells her that she doesn’t want to work a crappy job, she just wants to be successful. Maybe this is how she’s desperate.

Notes on Tiny Furniture:

Realness, part 1: Dunham uses her own family, her own high school friend, her own apartment, her own video art in the movie. But it’s not an amateurish movie. There are a lot of just perfectly framed shots. In the movie, her sister calls her “desperate”, calls her work desperate for attention, mostly because she’s not wearing pants. I read that her dad wouldn’t participate in the movie, because of privacy concerns.

Realness, part 2: What really won me over was Dunham’s enactment of failed femininity. Representations of girls who don’t just “naturally” exude cuteness and sweetness and girlness are really important to me, and I love how Dunham does this. Her hair’s unbrushed, she never wears pants, she has zits. When she wears lipstick or whatever it doesn’t look perfect or natural or right still. Don’t get me wrong, I think Dunham’s super-cute IRL, but she really, in the movie, works at looking ordinary. She kind of exposes herself to you, like she did in her video art, which draws a lot of comments on Youtube about how “fat” she is. I found it surprisingly compelling to be confronted constantly by a body that looks…a lot like mine. It seems counterintuitive to want to fix the problems of the male gaze by putting more partially dressed women on film, but it was really powerful for me.

Sex in a Pipe: I can’t even find anything to say about the sex-in-a-pipe scene, but I think it’s probably really important to the overall context of the movie and I just want to remind myself when I think of the movie not to forget about it.

Vulnerability is a privilege: I know one of the critiques of Dunham is that she’s uber-privileged. Her family’s well-off, her parents are successful in the art world, it kind of seems like she should have nothing to feel bad about, or no “real” problems or whatever. But I think that all those layers of privilege probably are what allows her to be this vulnerable, in her work. Just to feel safe exposing that much.

Being Successful: I like the part where Aura’s friend Charlotte tells her that their people are assholes, their parents are assholes. Aura insists that her mom isn’t an asshole, and Charlotte replies that she must be an asshole to be as successful as she is. I feel like the movie kind of posits the successful = asshole equation. Certainly true of “he’s a big deal on youtube” guy. While this isn’t true at all in my experience, I do feel like it’s probably something Aura believes. In the last scene, when Aura’s in bed with her mom, she tells her that she doesn’t want to work a crappy job, she just wants to be successful. Maybe this is how she’s desperate.

April 7, 2012
"

I don’t think that anybody looks at me and says, “she looks amazing and I want to be that lady,” but I think that there’s a thing that people trying to present their own experience, there’s a little bit of “who told you you were allowed to do this and why do you think we’re interested?” phenomenon, which I completely understand, although I think that people challenge women more who want to tell their own story.


Nobody challenges why they want to watch Larry David at lunch. You know why you want to watch Larry David at lunch: Cause he’s fucking hilarious and it’s amazing to watch him at lunch. You don’t care that he’s mean to his friends and lives in a giant house, it’s just interesting, and I think that women often have to make more excuses for why they want to portray themselves. I used to always apologize, to say, I’m so sorry for bringing misogyny up, but I’m going to stop apologizing for bringing it up, because we all know it’s real.

"

Every time I hear from Lena Dunham, I like her more.  (via sadybusiness)

Lena Dunham! I am really into Lena Dunham this week. 

I also really liked the parts where she talked about hate-reading turning into love-reading and her hatred of pants. (I just saw Tiny Furniture and have a lot of feelings about it.)

9:37am  |   URL: http://tmblr.co/ZSRIbyJEoOCR
  
Filed under: lena dunham film feminism 
April 4, 2012
mikkipedia:

superseventies:

‘I never even thought of burning my bra until I discovered Smirnoff’ - 1970s advertisement.

OH MYGOD

mikkipedia:

superseventies:

I never even thought of burning my bra until I discovered Smirnoff’ - 1970s advertisement.

OH MYGOD

(Source: wooliebear)

3:07pm  |   URL: http://tmblr.co/ZSRIbyJ4b76J
  
Filed under: feminism ! 
April 4, 2012
"Women are still in emotional bondage as long as we need to worry that we might have to make a choice between being heard and being loved."

Marianne Williamson  (via militanthope)

“women” can definitely be an interchangeable word here, but it’s still relevant.

(via suzy-x)

relevant

(via mikkipedia)

(Source: thagalukazz, via mikkipedia)

March 29, 2012
You know

kiriamaya:

I don’t celebrate people’s deaths. I hate it when anybody dies; it feels awful. But sometimes, I confess to find it hard to feel any sympathy or sadness for the death of someone… like, oh,  I dunno, someone who helped co-write Janice fucking Raymond’s anti-trans screed, seeing as how Janice Raymond was the one who ensured that it was next to impossible for trans* people to get health insurance of any kind.

Yes, I know she means a lot to people who are not trans* (and even some who are). That’s no reason to tell us to shut up. You can like her all you want, but don’t attack us for not liking her. And no, I don’t want to remember her as “complex” or “flawed” or “a product of her time”; I want to remember her as the deadly enemy that she was. And don’t try to tell us that it’s “not the time”, either, because I know from experience that it’s never “the time” with cis women and cis apologists.

…you know what, I can’t even with this shit. I mean, for fuck’s sake, we went over all this when Mary Daly died. I do not want to have to go over it all again with Adrienne Rich.

Oof. I did not know this re: Adrienne Rich. Obviously this doesn’t make her poems less good or valuable or smart (and as a reader you can have things mean a lot to you without necessarily signing on to an author’s whole value system), but still.

(via garlandgrey-deactivated20120712)

March 13, 2012
"[T]he fans really want me to be, exactly, Ron Swanson… But Ron is a fictional character who has certain superhuman abilities, especially when it comes to consuming meat and alcohol. Unfortunately, I live in the realm of biology and I can accumulate cholesterol, so I have to be a little more diet-conscious than Ron. I think I’m just generally a lot more girly than Ron Swanson. I mince about and giggle, I think, a lot more than Ron does… [the role] really plays on a certain aspect of my personality, but I have a lot of other facets. I could play a drag queen in a film, Ron never could. So I guess I’m a much more complex person than Ron."

Jason Bailey’s lovely interview with Nick Offerman. In addition to the above Ron Swanson thoughts, there is a very sweet story about Megan Mullally. One of my favorite things about this guy is that he always says wonderful, sincere things about his wife. (via judyxberman)

I am starting to think that Nick Offerman is the best guy ever? He also wrote last week’s episode of Parks, with the Laura Mulvey references and Rob Lowe hitting on the women’s studies teacher being like “I wanted to compliment your arms but I didn’t want to objectify you with my male gaze.” Which I thought was pretty funny.

6:40pm  |   URL: http://tmblr.co/ZSRIbyHxnE7a
  
Filed under: ron swanson feminism 
Liked posts on Tumblr: More liked posts »